The notion of Ghazwa-e-Hind, depicting a hypothetical Islamic conquest of India, has spurred controversy. Islamic scholars universally reject this claim, deeming it unfounded. Its roots trace to dubious Hadiths, often twisted for political agendas by extremist factions like Hizbul Mujahideen, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Jaish-e-Mohammed, fostering instability in India.
Deconstructing this doctrine, scholars expose its absence from authentic Islamic sources. “Ghazwa” implies battles led by Prophet Mohammad, while “Sirayah” denotes his companions’ leadership. Scholars discredit Ghazwa-e-Hind for conflicting with Islamic principles, questioning its authenticity.
Only two Hadiths vaguely mention Ghazwa-e-Hind, with one being widely dismissed. The other, related to peaceful trade, lacks credibility in significant Hadith collections. As Islamic belief precludes Prophet Mohammad’s return, both are rejected.
Islamic scholars from Egypt and Iran categorically refute Ghazwa-e-Hind, asserting it was never a part of genuine teachings. Historical Muslim rulers were driven by power, not this doctrine. Renowned figures like Abdul Haq Dehlavi and Imran Hussain also discredit it.
Ghazwa-e-Hind emerged in the last century, tied to Pakistan’s post-independence agenda. Exploited through Jihad in Kashmir, it ignited radicalism. Many Pakistani and Bangladeshi scholars distance themselves from this divisive concept.
Islamic teachings prioritize peace, denouncing violence and extremism. The Ghazwa-e-Hind doctrine serves political ends, manipulating vulnerable youth. Uniting scholars across the Islamic spectrum, this unfounded ideology stands against the faith’s core principles.
In summary, Ghazwa-e-Hind’s alleged prophecy lacks credibility among Islamic scholars due to misinterpretations, unverified Hadiths, and political motives. Authentic Islam emphasizes peace and ethics by rejecting violence and extremism, discrediting this divisive doctrine.
For a detailed story, please visit: Awaz the voice